Connect with us

Governing Bodies

Qatar 2022 build-up: How the famous yellow football shirt has become politicised

blank

Published

on

blank
Brazil at 1966 World Cup

When the much-awaited Brazil 2022 World Cup shirt was released in August, student João Vitor Gonçalves de Oliveira rushed to get his hands on the kit.

The 20-year-old went to the nearest store, grabbed the famous yellow and green top and took it to the till, where he was met with an excited smile.

“The shop owner assumed I support the current government because I was buying the shirt, and started to rage against left-wing candidate Lula,” João tells the BBC.

João does not support the government of Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing for re-election on Sunday. But buying the shirt, he realised in the store, could make people think he did.

In order to avoid confrontation, João pretended to be a Bolsonaro supporter. It was another sign that the yellow and green shirt – made famous by Pele, Ronaldo, and many others – has become a symbol of a divided nation.

“The shirt has become stained with political meaning since 2014,” says Mateus Gamba Torres, a history professor at the University of Brasília.

Advertisement

Eight years ago, millions of Brazilians took to the streets to protest against the then-President, Dilma Rousseff, dressed in the colours of the flag as they demanded the left-winger’s impeachment.

Then in 2018, the colours were again used by the current president – far-right Jair Bolsonaro.

This year too, green, yellow and blue are the key colours at Mr Bolsonaro’s rallies, with people wearing T-shirts, the national flag and accessories.

“The green and yellow shirt has become a symbol of those related to Bolsonaro’s government,” Mr Gamba Torres says, “which means a good part of the population no longer identify with it.”

João’s encounter with the shop owner is not the only reason he is now hesitant to talk politics. In Brazil, political disputes can seemingly get deadly.

Advertisement

In July, Marcelo Aloizio de Arruda – a supporter of former president and left-wing candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva – was shot dead at his 50th birthday party, allegedly by a police officer shouting in support of right-wing President Bolsonaro.

Before he died, Mr Arruda retaliated and shot his alleged attacker – who spent some time in hospital before being sent to prison, where he awaits trial.

And on 9 September, 44-year-old Benedito Cardoso dos Santos was allegedly killed by a colleague, following a heated political discussion between the two. The 22-year-old suspect remains in police custody.

Tech programmer Ruy Araújo Souza Júnior, 43, tells BBC News he will only wear the shirt at home, to avoid being mistaken for a Bolsonaro supporter.

If ex-President Lula wins the election, he hopes the shirt will “once again unite us and symbolise true love of our country, not a political party”.

Advertisement

Left-wing candidate Lula has focused on “reclaiming” the flag. Several of his supporters, such as singer Ludmilla, international star Anitta, and rapper Djonga, have made a point of wearing the shirt during their performances.

Djonga, who was part of Nike’s official campaign for the Brazilian World Cup kit, told a crowd at one concert that wearing the shirt in public was an act of protest.

“They [Bolsonaro supporters] think everything is theirs, they appropriate the meaning of family, they appropriate our national anthem, they appropriate everything,” he said. “But here’s the truth: everything is ours, nothing is theirs.”

But it’s not just Mr Bolsonaro’s opponents who are wary of wearing the shirt.

“I’m a patriot and right-wing. I really want to vote wearing my yellow shirt,” says Bolsonaro supporter Alessandra Passos, 41.

Advertisement

But due to the tense environment between voters, she says, she is “afraid to wear it on voting day”.

But what do the footballers themselves think of the shirt becoming a political symbol? Brazil and Tottenham forward Richarlison says the connotations disconnect Brazilians from the shirt and the flag, taking away part of the country’s shared identity.

“As a fan, player and Brazilian, I do my best to spread the identification we have with them to the whole world. I believe it’s important to recognise that we are all Brazilians and have Brazilian blood [above anything else].”

And Nike’s advertising campaign for the new shirt features personalities from different sides of the political spectrum – focusing on togetherness as its main topic. The shirt, Nike says, is “collective. It represents more than 210 million Brazilians. It’s ours”.

The brand also banned the customisation of shirts with political references or religious terms. Yet many Brazilians still chose to purchase the blue away shirt instead, which sold out a few hours after its release.

Advertisement

Futsal (a form of indoor football popular in Brazil) coach Matheus Rocha, 28, tells BBC News he has decided to wear the blue shirt this year.

“I don’t feel any desire to wear the yellow shirt,” he says. “Actually, the idea of wearing it repulses me, I don’t even take my old ones out of my drawer. It’s a shame, because the shirt itself is gorgeous.”

He says the same sentiment was shared among his friendship group and colleagues. “RIP yellow shirt,” he says. “And I hope Brazil wins its sixth World Cup title in blue for the people.”

Although many share Matheus’s sentiments, the shirt is still popular with other football fans across the country.

Supporter group Movimento Verde e Amarelo (Green and Yellow movement) thinks the World Cup will help get Brazilians back behind the yellow shirt.

Advertisement

“We don’t agree with those who insist the Seleção’s yellow shirt is dead, it’s just sad to see it being used as an excuse for political clashes,” says Luiz Carvalho, founding member of the group.

“It makes no sense to say the yellow shirt doesn’t represent this or that politician when the whole idea behind it is exactly the opposite,” he adds.

“When our team enter the pitch, so does the pride we have as Brazilians. So whatever happens in the October polls, the love we share should prevail, as it always did.”

And yet, for some Bolsonaro supporters, the shirt has become an even bigger symbol of patriotic love – taking on a new life during his government.

“There was no sense of patriotism before Bolsonaro’s government, because leftist governments don’t wear our flag,” Adriana Moraes do Nascimento, 49, tells the BBC.

Advertisement

“Thank God our president loves Brazil and he has saved these values for us.”

To Adriana, the shirt used only refer to football and now shows love for the country.

“If the left wins the election, the flag will disappear once again,” she says. “Have you ever seen a flag in their hands? No. But that is not going to happen, as President Bolsonaro will win.”

This is the first time Brazil’s presidential election has been so closely aligned with the World Cup, both in its timeline and in social discussions.

Professor Gamba Torres says Brazilians need to disassociate the shirt with politics. “A shirt is just a shirt,” he says.

Advertisement

“Of course it has meanings, but it ultimately doesn’t represent one specific government. Governments come and go, but our country and our team will always exist.”

-BBC

Kunle Solaja is the author of landmark books on sports and journalism as well as being a multiple award-winning journalist and editor of long standing. He is easily Nigeria’s foremost soccer diarist and Africa's most capped FIFA World Cup journalist, having attended all FIFA World Cup finals from Italia ’90 to Qatar 2022. He was honoured at the Qatar 2022 World Cup by FIFA and AIPS.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Governing Bodies

FIFA Clocks 122 as World Football Body Celebrates Historic Milestone

blank

Published

on

blank

World football governing body, FIFA, today clocks its 122nd anniversary, celebrating more than a century of overseeing and expanding the global game.

Founded on May 21, 1904, in Paris, France, FIFA began with just seven member associations — France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.

From that modest beginning, the organisation has grown into the most influential sports governing body in the world, with 211 member associations spread across all continents.

Over the decades, FIFA has transformed football into a truly global phenomenon through competitions such as the FIFA World Cup, Women’s World Cup, Club World Cup, youth tournaments, and developmental programmes aimed at growing the game worldwide.

The organisation has also witnessed remarkable milestones, including the expansion of the men’s World Cup from 13 teams in 1930 to 48 teams beginning from the 2026 edition to be jointly hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Advertisement

FIFA’s journey has equally reflected football’s growing influence beyond sport, with the game becoming a major tool for diplomacy, social inclusion, youth empowerment, and economic development across the world.

As FIFA celebrates 122 years of existence, attention is now focused on the future of the game, technological innovations, expanded competitions, women’s football growth, and the continued globalisation of football.

Visit the Sports Village Square Channel:

https://www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Governing Bodies

UEFA hands lifetime ban to the Czech coach who secretly filmed female players

blank

Published

on

blank
Petr Vlachovsky

UEFA has issued a lifetime ban to Petr Vlachovsky, a Czech women’s soccer coach who secretly filmed ​his players, the governing body announced on Tuesday.

Czech media ‌reported that the coach was convicted in May 2025 and initially received a suspended one-year prison sentence and a five-year domestic ​coaching ban for filming FC Slovacko’s players in ​changing rooms, the youngest of whom was 17.

In ⁠a statement, UEFA’s Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body (CEDB) said ​it had decided to ban Vlachovsky “from exercising any football-related activity ​for life” following the appointment of an Ethics and Disciplinary Inspector to investigate allegations of potential misconduct.

“The CEDB further decided to ​request FIFA to extend the abovementioned ban on a ​worldwide level and to order the Football Association of the Czech Republic ‌to ⁠revoke Mr Petr Vlachovsky’s coaching licence,” the statement added.

FC Slovacko did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

Advertisement

Football players’ union FIFPRO welcomed the ban as ​well as UEFA’s ​request for ⁠world soccer governing body FIFA to impose an international ban on Vlachovsky.

“This outcome sends ​a strong and necessary message that abusive and ​inappropriate ⁠behaviour has no place in football and that safeguarding the well-being of players must remain a priority at every ⁠level ​of the game,” FIFPRO added in ​a statement.

Vlachovsky had also previously served as coach of the Czech women’s ​Under-19s team.

RELATED STORY: https://sportsvillagesquare.com/2026/04/08/outrage-as-male-coach-who-secretly-filmed-women-players-still-free-to-work-in-football/

-Reuters

Advertisement

Visit the Sports Village Square Channel:

https://www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Continue Reading

Governing Bodies

Southampton expelled from EFL playoff final after spying breach

blank

Published

on

blank
 FA Cup - Semi Final - Manchester City v Southampton - Wembley Stadium, London, Britain - April 25, 2026 Southampton's Finn Azaz looks dejected after the match. Action Images via Reuters/Paul Childs/File Photo 

Southampton have been kicked out of the Championship playoff final after being found guilty of ​spying on semi-final opponents Middlesbrough, the English Football League said on Tuesday.

Middlesbrough, who lost 2-1 to Southampton ‌on aggregate in the semi, have been reinstated and will face Hull City on Saturday in what is dubbed the world’s richest soccer match.

Promotion to the Premier League, even with an immediate relegation, is estimated to be worth in the region of 200 million ​pounds ($268.10 million) over three seasons.

Southampton, who admitted the charges, were also found guilty of filming training sessions ​involving Oxford United in December and Ipswich Town in April during the regular season.

They ⁠have also been deducted four points from the start of next season in England’s second tier.

Advertisement

“An Independent Disciplinary Commission ​has today expelled Southampton from the Championship play-offs after the club admitted multiple breaches of EFL regulations related to ​the unauthorised filming of other clubs’ training,” the EFL said.

“Southampton admitted breaches of Regulations requiring Clubs to act with the utmost good faith and prohibiting the observation of another Club’s training session within 72 hours of a scheduled match.

“The effect of today’s order is that ​Middlesbrough are reinstated into the 2026 play-offs and will proceed to the play-off final against Hull City. The ​final remains scheduled for Saturday 23 May, with the kick-off time to be confirmed.”

The EFL confirmed that Southampton could appeal against the ‌decision ⁠and that “parties are working to try and resolve any appeal on Wednesday 20 May.

“Subject to the outcome, it could result in a further change to Saturday’s fixture,” the statement said.

Advertisement

‘BORO CALLED FOR SOUTHAMPTON EXPULSION

Middlesbrough had called for Southampton’s expulsion after having a training session at their Rockliffe Park site filmed 48 hours ahead of the first leg of ​their playoff semi-final with Southampton ​which ended 0-0.

The north-east ⁠club said they welcomed the decision.

“We believe this sends out a clear message for the future of our game regarding sporting integrity and conduct,” the north Middlesbrough said in ​a statement.

“As a club, we are now focused on our game against Hull City ​at Wembley on ⁠Saturday.”

Southampton were relegated from the Premier League last season and were struggling in the early part of this campaign until a storming finish in which they went unbeaten in 19 league games to finish fourth and enter the playoffs.

Advertisement

The south-coast ⁠club are ​the first to fall foul of the Football League’s regulation 127 — ​brought in after Leeds United were found guilty of spying on Derby County seven years ago, an offence for which they were fined 200,000 ​pounds.

-Reuters

Continue Reading

Most Viewed