Connect with us

Governing Bodies

CORONAVIRUS: NO GOOD OPTION IN SIGHT FOR TOKYO OLYMPIC LEADERS

blank

Published

on

In his two decades as a consultant to organisations vying to host the Olympic Games, Terrence Burns helped write and review official bids and plans from dozens of potential candidate cities.

In all those bids, he said, discussions of potential disruptions to the event were fairly narrow in scope: mostly natural disasters, like earthquakes or fires, and, more recently, terrorist attacks.

“I’ve never seen an Olympic organising committee asked, ‘Are you prepared for a global pandemic?’” Mr Burns said this week.

Now, with just under five months to go before the scheduled opening of the Summer Olympics in Tokyo on July 24, organisers in Japan and at the International Olympic Committee headquarters in Switzerland are grappling with the coronavirus outbreak, which is threatening to derail the world’s largest sporting event.

In preparing for the Olympics, Japan’s public health planning until now had focused on the prevention of measles and rubella, sexually transmitted diseases and food poisoning. 

Advertisement

A new disease, like the coronavirus, was not central to their calculations.

Still, as the virus has begun to spread through the country, officials in Japan have played down suggestions that plans for the games could be altered or even cancelled. 

At a news briefing on Wednesday, chief Cabinet secretary Yoshihide Suga said that preparations for the games were proceeding “as planned”, adding that the Olympic torch would begin its journey to Japan in March according to schedule.

The IOC has also declined to entertain the possibility that the games might not take place exactly as planned.

But sporting events in Japan and elsewhere are already being cancelled, as governments try to discourage large gatherings in major cities. 

Advertisement

Many who have procured tickets and made travel plans are now wondering whether they will have to scrap them.

“We’ve had our first guests calling to ask questions about cancelling,” Mr Anbritt Stengele, president of Sports Traveler, a travel agency specialising in packages to international sporting events, said this week. 

“Everyone in the industry is monitoring it and concerned.” 

People across the Olympic world have begun to ponder, then, what might happen if the coronavirus has not been brought under control before the summer.

“I’m sure somewhere within the walls of the IOC headquarters there’s a big board with various scenarios on it where people are thinking about, ‘OK, what do we do in a worst-case situation?” said Mr Dick Pound, a longtime IOC member.

Advertisement

There are options, of course, according to people like Mr Burns who have worked with the Olympics for decades. None are very appealing.

MOVING THE GAMES 

One theoretical solution involves moving the Olympics to a different locale – perhaps a city that has recently hosted the games, like London, or one that might be gearing up to, like Los Angeles.

It has happened with other major sports events. The 2003 Women’s World Cup was relocated from China to the United States during the outbreak of Sars.

But the Women’s World Cup, particularly back then, was a considerably smaller event in scope than the Olympics, with far fewer travelling fans, athletes, sponsors and media members. 

And in general, stadiums that can accommodate soccer, the world’s most popular sport, are easy to find. Venues that can host surfing, sailing, equestrian dressage and track cycling? Less so.

Advertisement

Olympic host cities block out rooms in countless hotels. They reserve high-profile venues, generate public safety and transportation plans, and deal with a host of other logistical and legal issues years in advance, in anticipation of tens of thousands of visitors.

“Who could put on an event the size and scope of the Olympic Games even beginning today, five months out?” Mr Pound said. “Nobody, realistically.” 

There is also the question of whether it would even make sense amid a viral epidemic to have thousands of people from around the world congregate in another city and then return to their homes.

Dr Yasuyuki Kato, professor of infectious diseases at the International University of Health and Welfare in Narita, Japan, noted that the games could act as “a hub to disseminate the virus to other countries”. 

CANCELLING THE GAMES 

The Olympics have been cancelled outright three times – in 1916, 1940 and 1944 – during the world wars.

Advertisement

The prospect of a cancellation now, when so many parties have invested billions of dollars and years of labour – and have legal contracts – seems almost unthinkable.

Broadcasters have carved out huge programming blocks, and marketers have built campaigns meant to culminate in Tokyo. Athletes have trained for years to appear on that stage.

“I’ll tell you who definitely doesn’t want to cancel is NBC,” said Dr Jules Boykoff, a professor of politics and an expert on Olympic history at Pacific University in Oregon. 

“They have put billions into the rights to these Olympics. There will be serious disgruntlement from those who have power. They will insist that the games go on.” 

A spokesman for NBC said, “The safety of our employees is always our top priority, but there is no impact on our preparations at this time.” 

Advertisement

The spread of viruses can be suppressed in warmer months, and Dr Melissa Nolan, an expert on infectious diseases at the University of South Carolina, said “most predictions estimate we’ll see a major decline by July”. 

But Mr Pound said he believed any decision to cancel or modify the games would have to be initiated by late May.

Asked about Mr Pound’s comments, Mr Suga, Japan’s chief Cabinet secretary, said they were “not the official view of the IOC”. 

And the Tokyo 2020 organising committee, responding to questions from The New York Times, said that it was “not considering cancelling”. 

POSTPONING THE GAMES 

In 2001, days after the Sept 11 terrorist attacks, organisers of the Ryder Cup, a team golf competition between the United States and Europe that was historically staged in odd-numbered years, decided to postpone the event for 12 months after top golfers like Tiger Woods expressed concern about flying. 

Advertisement

To accommodate the change, the Presidents Cup, a team golf competition that had been staged in even-numbered years, was also pushed back a year, to 2003.

A similar but more complicated sort of rejiggering would be required if the Olympics were to be postponed by a few months or a full year.

Pushing the games to the summer of 2021 would put them in direct conflict with world championship events in several sports, which would likely have to be moved as well.

Holding the games just a few months later would put them in direct competition with a host of other professional sports competitions that would not move to accommodate them. 

For example, while NBA basketball players are available in July, they are not available in October.

Advertisement

In addition, NBC is busy with football in the fall, while its summer programming is largely dedicated to the Olympics. 

“Olympic parties don’t want to host Olympic Games in the middle of the NFL football season for obvious financial reasons,” Mr Burns said.

ATHLETES ONLY 

With few good options, organisers could be forced to get creative.

One way to satisfy broadcasters could be to hold the events behind closed doors, a nod to the reality that most fans watch the games on television. 

But it’s unclear if public safety concerns would be addressed if thousands of athletes, coaches and staff members from around the world were still congregating in competition venues.

Advertisement

Or could the Olympics go on in Tokyo as planned – with, perhaps, travel from certain countries barred, screening zones in every venue and public space, and plenty of hand sanitiser and masks on hand?

 At some point, though, such an event might not feel like the Olympics, which is supposed to be a peaceful celebration of people from more than 200 countries. 

Can the Olympics be the Olympics without majestic opening and closing ceremonies in packed stadiums, or if events are spread out across multiple cities?

The questions may grow louder as the virus spreads further.

 “It’s unusual, it’s unprecedented, it’s a complex issue,” Mr Burns said, “and if something indeed happens, it will have a complex solution.”

Advertisement

-New York Times

Kunle Solaja is the author of landmark books on sports and journalism as well as being a multiple award-winning journalist and editor of long standing. He is easily Nigeria’s foremost soccer diarist and Africa's most capped FIFA World Cup journalist, having attended all FIFA World Cup finals from Italia ’90 to Qatar 2022. He was honoured at the Qatar 2022 World Cup by FIFA and AIPS.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Governing Bodies

FIFA Clocks 122 as World Football Body Celebrates Historic Milestone

blank

Published

on

blank

World football governing body, FIFA, today clocks its 122nd anniversary, celebrating more than a century of overseeing and expanding the global game.

Founded on May 21, 1904, in Paris, France, FIFA began with just seven member associations — France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.

From that modest beginning, the organisation has grown into the most influential sports governing body in the world, with 211 member associations spread across all continents.

Over the decades, FIFA has transformed football into a truly global phenomenon through competitions such as the FIFA World Cup, Women’s World Cup, Club World Cup, youth tournaments, and developmental programmes aimed at growing the game worldwide.

The organisation has also witnessed remarkable milestones, including the expansion of the men’s World Cup from 13 teams in 1930 to 48 teams beginning from the 2026 edition to be jointly hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Advertisement

FIFA’s journey has equally reflected football’s growing influence beyond sport, with the game becoming a major tool for diplomacy, social inclusion, youth empowerment, and economic development across the world.

As FIFA celebrates 122 years of existence, attention is now focused on the future of the game, technological innovations, expanded competitions, women’s football growth, and the continued globalisation of football.

Visit the Sports Village Square Channel:

https://www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Governing Bodies

UEFA hands lifetime ban to the Czech coach who secretly filmed female players

blank

Published

on

blank
Petr Vlachovsky

UEFA has issued a lifetime ban to Petr Vlachovsky, a Czech women’s soccer coach who secretly filmed ​his players, the governing body announced on Tuesday.

Czech media ‌reported that the coach was convicted in May 2025 and initially received a suspended one-year prison sentence and a five-year domestic ​coaching ban for filming FC Slovacko’s players in ​changing rooms, the youngest of whom was 17.

In ⁠a statement, UEFA’s Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body (CEDB) said ​it had decided to ban Vlachovsky “from exercising any football-related activity ​for life” following the appointment of an Ethics and Disciplinary Inspector to investigate allegations of potential misconduct.

“The CEDB further decided to ​request FIFA to extend the abovementioned ban on a ​worldwide level and to order the Football Association of the Czech Republic ‌to ⁠revoke Mr Petr Vlachovsky’s coaching licence,” the statement added.

FC Slovacko did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

Advertisement

Football players’ union FIFPRO welcomed the ban as ​well as UEFA’s ​request for ⁠world soccer governing body FIFA to impose an international ban on Vlachovsky.

“This outcome sends ​a strong and necessary message that abusive and ​inappropriate ⁠behaviour has no place in football and that safeguarding the well-being of players must remain a priority at every ⁠level ​of the game,” FIFPRO added in ​a statement.

Vlachovsky had also previously served as coach of the Czech women’s ​Under-19s team.

RELATED STORY: https://sportsvillagesquare.com/2026/04/08/outrage-as-male-coach-who-secretly-filmed-women-players-still-free-to-work-in-football/

-Reuters

Advertisement

Visit the Sports Village Square Channel:

https://www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Continue Reading

Governing Bodies

Southampton expelled from EFL playoff final after spying breach

blank

Published

on

blank
 FA Cup - Semi Final - Manchester City v Southampton - Wembley Stadium, London, Britain - April 25, 2026 Southampton's Finn Azaz looks dejected after the match. Action Images via Reuters/Paul Childs/File Photo 

Southampton have been kicked out of the Championship playoff final after being found guilty of ​spying on semi-final opponents Middlesbrough, the English Football League said on Tuesday.

Middlesbrough, who lost 2-1 to Southampton ‌on aggregate in the semi, have been reinstated and will face Hull City on Saturday in what is dubbed the world’s richest soccer match.

Promotion to the Premier League, even with an immediate relegation, is estimated to be worth in the region of 200 million ​pounds ($268.10 million) over three seasons.

Southampton, who admitted the charges, were also found guilty of filming training sessions ​involving Oxford United in December and Ipswich Town in April during the regular season.

They ⁠have also been deducted four points from the start of next season in England’s second tier.

Advertisement

“An Independent Disciplinary Commission ​has today expelled Southampton from the Championship play-offs after the club admitted multiple breaches of EFL regulations related to ​the unauthorised filming of other clubs’ training,” the EFL said.

“Southampton admitted breaches of Regulations requiring Clubs to act with the utmost good faith and prohibiting the observation of another Club’s training session within 72 hours of a scheduled match.

“The effect of today’s order is that ​Middlesbrough are reinstated into the 2026 play-offs and will proceed to the play-off final against Hull City. The ​final remains scheduled for Saturday 23 May, with the kick-off time to be confirmed.”

The EFL confirmed that Southampton could appeal against the ‌decision ⁠and that “parties are working to try and resolve any appeal on Wednesday 20 May.

“Subject to the outcome, it could result in a further change to Saturday’s fixture,” the statement said.

Advertisement

‘BORO CALLED FOR SOUTHAMPTON EXPULSION

Middlesbrough had called for Southampton’s expulsion after having a training session at their Rockliffe Park site filmed 48 hours ahead of the first leg of ​their playoff semi-final with Southampton ​which ended 0-0.

The north-east ⁠club said they welcomed the decision.

“We believe this sends out a clear message for the future of our game regarding sporting integrity and conduct,” the north Middlesbrough said in ​a statement.

“As a club, we are now focused on our game against Hull City ​at Wembley on ⁠Saturday.”

Southampton were relegated from the Premier League last season and were struggling in the early part of this campaign until a storming finish in which they went unbeaten in 19 league games to finish fourth and enter the playoffs.

Advertisement

The south-coast ⁠club are ​the first to fall foul of the Football League’s regulation 127 — ​brought in after Leeds United were found guilty of spying on Derby County seven years ago, an offence for which they were fined 200,000 ​pounds.

-Reuters

Continue Reading

Most Viewed