Connect with us

International Football

European clubs and leagues reject Super League after EU Court verdict

blank

Published

on

Major clubs and leagues across Europe rejected the Super League in favour of the status quo following Thursday’s EU court verdict which said UEFA and FIFA contravened EU law by preventing the formation of a Super League.

Manchester United were one of the first to say they remain committed to playing in competitions run by Europe’s soccer governing body UEFA, as did German champions Bayern Munich.

United were one of the 12 clubs involved in the formation of the breakaway Super League in April 2021 but pulled out due to pressure from fans, governments and players.

“Our position has not changed. We remain fully committed to participation in UEFA competitions, and to positive cooperation with UEFA, the Premier League, and fellow clubs through the ECA on the continued development of the European game,” the club said.

Manchester City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur were the other five Premier League clubs involved before pulling out.

Advertisement

Two months after the six English clubs pulled out of the project in 2021, they said they would offer a combined 22 million pounds ($27.78 million) as “a gesture of goodwill” to go towards the good of the game, including new investment to support fans, grassroots football and community programmes

The Premier League said they would face a 30-point deduction if they attempt a similar move in future and each would be fined 25 million pounds for any such breakaway attempt.

“The ruling does not endorse the so-called “European Super League” and the Premier League continues to reject any such concept,” the Premier League said in a statement.

“Supporters are of vital importance to the game and they have time and again made clear their opposition to a ‘breakaway’ competition that severs the link between domestic and European football.”

DOOR CLOSED

Bayern Munich said they were committed to UEFA competitions, saying the door for the Super League “remains closed” for the German champions.

Advertisement

“The Bundesliga is the foundation of FC Bayern, just as all national leagues are the foundation of other European football clubs,” Bayern CEO Jan Christian Dreesen said.

“It is therefore our duty and our deep conviction to strengthen them, not to weaken them. We are also committed to the European club competitions under the umbrella of UEFA.”

The German Football League (DFL), which is in charge of the Bundesliga, said it “explicitly supports the European sports model and rejects competitions outside those competitions organised by the federations and the leagues”.

The European Club Association (ECA), which represents nearly 500 clubs across the continent, said the football world had “moved on from the Super League years ago”.

“Through ECA, clubs today are already at the heart of decision-making in relation to the competitions they participate in,” the ECA said.

Advertisement

“Most importantly, football is a social contract not a legal contract.

“All the recognised stakeholders… spanning confederations, federations, clubs, leagues, players and fans stand more united than ever against the attempts by a few individuals pursuing personal agendas to undermine the very foundations and basic principles of European football.”

France’s Ligue de Football Professionnel (LFP) said it “unequivocally supports” competitions organised by UEFA.

The Italian Football Federation (FIGC) reiterated its intention to protect the national championships, “for the defence of the broader and more general principle of sporting merit and the respect of international calendars”.

“The FIGC believes that the Super League is not a project compatible with these conditions and will always act in pursuing the general interests of Italian football,” it added.

Advertisement

-Reuters

 

 

Kunle Solaja is the author of landmark books on sports and journalism as well as being a multiple award-winning journalist and editor of long standing. He is easily Nigeria’s foremost soccer diarist and Africa's most capped FIFA World Cup journalist, having attended all FIFA World Cup finals from Italia ’90 to Qatar 2022. He was honoured at the Qatar 2022 World Cup by FIFA and AIPS.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

International Football

Iwobi Sent Off as Super Eagles Held to 2-2 Draw by Jordan in Antalya

blank

Published

on

blank
A fierce midfield duel as Jordan’s Ibrahim Sabra challenges Nigeria’s Raphael Onyediaka for possession.

Nigeria’s Super Eagles were held to a 2-2 draw by FIFA World Cup-bound Jordan in an eventful international friendly in Antalya on Tuesday night, with the contest overshadowed by a late red card to Alex Iwobi.

Iwobi, making his 98th appearance for the national team, was sent off in the closing stages, capping a dramatic encounter in which Nigeria surrendered a first-half lead and finished the game with ten men.

The match, played at the Mardan Sports Complex, brought Nigeria’s March international window to a close, but it proved anything but routine as both sides delivered a fiercely contested and entertaining clash.

Jordan, ranked 64th in the world and enjoying strong recent form, struck first in the 17th minute through Mousa Tamari. A well-worked free-kick routine caught the Nigerian defence napping, allowing the forward to fire home the opener.

Nigeria responded quickly and thought they had equalised six minutes later when Raphael Onyedika finished from a Moses Simon cut-back, but the goal was controversially ruled out.

Advertisement

The Super Eagles eventually drew level in the 30th minute. Stand-in captain Moses Simon, earning his 97th cap, reacted fastest after Ademola Lookman’s effort was blocked, slotting home with a composed left-footed finish for his second goal in as many matches.

Nigeria went ahead four minutes before halftime when Bright Osayi-Samuel’s pinpoint cross found debutant Emmanuel Fernandez, who showed great composure to control and finish, giving the three-time African champions a 2-1 lead at the interval.

The second half took on a more physical tone, with goalkeeper Francis Uzoho forced off in the 57th minute after sustaining an injury while clearing the ball. Adebayo Adeleye replaced him between the posts.

Head coach Eric Chelle introduced Wilfred Ndidi and Alex Iwobi to shore up the midfield, but Jordan continued to press and were rewarded with an equaliser in the 77th minute.

Nigeria pushed for a winner late on, handing a senior debut to Philip Otele, while Samuel Chukwueze came on for Moses Simon. However, the closing moments were marred by Iwobi’s dismissal, leaving the Super Eagles to see out the match with ten men.

Advertisement

Despite the draw, the encounter offered valuable insights for the coaching crew as Nigeria continues preparations for the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations qualifiers.

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Continue Reading

International Football

Super Eagles Face Stern Test Against World Cup-Bound Al-Nashama

blank

Published

on

blank

By Kunle Solaja

Match Context

  • Fixture: Jordan vs Nigeria
  • Venue: Antalya, Turkey
  • Occasion: Four-Nation Invitational Tournament
  • Kick-off: Tuesday (evening)

They would have loved facing Jamaica in Mexico today for a place at the World Cup, but fate has other plans, and Nigeria’s Super Eagles will be taking on World Cup debutants Jordan in a friendly match instead in Turkey.

The encounter promises to be a revealing contest for both sides as preparations intensify for future global assignments.

The encounter, staged as part of a four-nation tournament in Turkey, will be the third meeting between the two countries, with the head-to-head record finely poised.

History Beckons in Third Meeting

Advertisement

Nigeria claimed a 2-0 victory in their first clash at the National Stadium, Lagos, on 28 April 2004 during the LG Cup.

However, the tables turned in 2013 when a largely experimental Nigerian side under the late Stephen Keshi suffered a 1-0 defeat in Amman, courtesy of a Hatem Aqel penalty.

This latest meeting now serves as the decider in what has quietly become a balanced rivalry.

Jordan arrive in buoyant mood, riding on the crest of a historic achievement, which is their first-ever qualification for the FIFA World Cup (2026).

blank

Jordan’s Al-Nashama

Their recent form underlines a team growing in confidence and tactical discipline. In the past months, Al-Nashama have:

Advertisement
  • Held Russia (0-0)
  • Defeated Dominican Republic (3-0)
  • Drawn with Mali (0-0)
  • Narrowly lost to Bolivia (1-0) and Albania (4-2)
  • Pushed Tunisia (3-2 loss) in a competitive encounter

They also opened this invitational tournament with a 2-2 draw against Costa Rica, further evidence of their resilience.

The team’s preparations have been boosted by a morale-lifting visit from Prince Ali bin Al-Hussein, President of the Jordan Football Association, during their Antalya training camp.

Coach Jamal Al-Salami has deliberately scheduled matches against Nigeria and Costa Rica, citing their stylistic similarity to World Cup opponents such as Argentina, Austria, and Algeria.

Despite missing several key players, including star forward Mousa Ta’mari, Jordan have continued to show depth, blending senior players with youth prospects as part of a broader developmental strategy.

Nigeria head into the clash with renewed confidence after a 2-1 victory over Iran in their opening game of the tournament, with goals from Moses Simon and Akor Adams.

Unlike previous meetings, the Super Eagles are expected to field a full-strength squad, packed with Europe-based stars, something Jordanian observers have already described as a “heavyweight challenge.”

Advertisement

The squad boasts a blend of experience and attacking flair.

The presence of multiple attacking options gives Nigeria a clear edge going forward, while their physicality and pace could pose serious problems for the Jordanians.

Jordan are expected to adopt a compact, disciplined shape, relying on quick transitions and defensive organisation, qualities that earned them results against stronger opposition in recent friendlies.

Nigeria, by contrast, will likely dominate possession, using width and individual brilliance to break down Jordan’s defensive lines.

The key battle may lie in midfield, where Jordan’s structure will be tested against Nigeria’s blend of strength, technique, and tempo.

Advertisement

For Jordan, this is another step in fine-tuning a squad preparing for its historic World Cup debut—a chance to measure themselves against elite opposition.

For Nigeria, it is an opportunity to assert authority, build cohesion among its star-studded squad, and maintain momentum ahead of more competitive fixtures.

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Continue Reading

International Football

Fans furious over clash of kit colours in US v Belgium friendly

blank

Published

on

blank
USA’s Christian Pulisic (10) controls the ball against Belgium at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Dale Zanine-Imagn Images 

A clash of kit colours caused confusion for players and made it difficult for fans watching on TV to tell the teams apart as World Cup co-hosts, the U.S., ​were accused of being responsible for a mix-up in a 5-2 friendly defeat ‌by Belgium on Saturday.

Both teams used the match to launch the new kit they will wear at the June 11 to July 19 World Cup, which is also being held in Canada and Mexico.

The U.S. sported a ​design that pulls directly from the red and white stripes in the American flag, while ​Belgium wore their away kit, which was light blue with pink accents.

“Sometimes ⁠you had to look twice, especially if you wanted to play quickly,” Belgian winger Jeremy Doku ​told his national television afterwards. “I would have preferred clearer colours.”

American captain Christian Pulisic said it was ​difficult to deal with.

Advertisement

“A lot of times you get the ball, and you look up, you can’t really lock in on something. You can only base it on the colour of the shirt. That’s how it works,” ​he told reporters. “And when it’s very similar, it’s difficult.”

Belgian television apologised to viewers after the ​match, with analyst and former Belgian international Marc Degryse criticising organisers.

“Football is a product that needs to be sold. ‌Everything ⁠always has to be better and better, yet they still managed to make the match annoying with the jerseys,” he said.

“This goes completely against the whole commercial aspect. This is really unacceptable.”

US Soccer said pictures of both jerseys were sent to match referees before the match, and at ​no time did they ​indicate they felt there ⁠was a conflict.

Advertisement

Belgian media said on Sunday the fault lay with the hosts, who insisted on playing in their new red and white jerseys, ​which clashed with both Belgium’s first-choice red strip and also the lighter ​away kit.

Both ⁠countries wanted to unveil their new jerseys for the first time, but after becoming aware of the situation, Belgium proposed to play in their traditional red, the reports said.

However, that was not an ⁠option because ​the U.S. shirt also contains a lot of red. ​One solution could have been for the U.S. to play in their dark blue kit, but that did not fit into ​their commercial plan, the reports added.

-Reuters

Advertisement

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Continue Reading

Most Viewed