Nike is investigating a design issue affecting several national team kits ahead of this year’s soccer World Cup, ​British media reported on Friday, after problems with the ‌shirts became visible during last month’s international break.

Bulging around the shoulder seams was visible on shirts worn by teams including England, France ​and Uruguay during the international window.

International Friendly – England v Uruguay – Wembley Stadium, London, Britain – March 27, 2026 England’s Cole Palmer reacts Action Images via Reuters/Andrew Couldridge/File Photo 

A Nike spokesperson told ​The Guardian newspaper that the company had identified a “minor ⁠issue” with the kits, adding that performance was unaffected ​but the “overall aesthetic is not where it needs to be.”

The ​issue is present on both match shirts worn by players and replica versions sold to supporters, according to the BBC, with some fans raising ​concerns.

The American sportswear giant produces kits for a number ​of World Cup teams, including co-hosts the United States and Canada, as ‌well ⁠as Brazil, the Netherlands and Croatia.

The kits have been designed with cooling technology to help players cope with high temperatures expected at the tournament, which kicks off on June 11 ​and is also ​co-hosted by ⁠Mexico.

The issue comes as the struggling company faces questions over its product innovation and works through excess ​inventory after a string of weak earnings.

Chief ​Executive Elliott ⁠Hill has pledged to refocus Nike on core sports, and the company said on Friday it had appointed Andy Caine ⁠as chief ​innovation officer.

Nike did not immediately respond ​to a Reuters request for comment.

-Reuters

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Jean-Jacques Ndala has been dramatically dropped from the list of match officials for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, in what many observers are describing as a “career-defining red card” following the fallout from the controversial AFCON 2025 Final.

The Congolese referee, once regarded as one of Africa’s elite officials, has reportedly been excluded from FIFA’s final World Cup roster just two months before the tournament—despite having been part of the preparatory pool.

From Centre Stage to Sidelines

Ndala’s fall from contention is closely tied to his handling of the explosive final between Morocco and Senegal in Rabat—a match that has since become one of the most disputed in recent African football history.

The encounter was riddled with controversial decisions, eventually leading to a temporary walk-off by Senegalese players. Matters escalated further when the result was later overturned, placing Ndala’s officiating under intense scrutiny.

Unverified reports have also alleged that the referee may have acted under “institutional instructions,” including directives not to issue red cards to Senegal players after the disruption—claims that remain unproven but have added to the controversy surrounding the match.

In the immediate aftermath, the Confederation of African Football cleared Ndala of any wrongdoing and continued to appoint him to matches, signalling institutional confidence in his competence.

FIFA, however, appears to have taken a different view.

By omitting Ndala from its final list of referees for the World Cup, world football’s governing body has effectively overruled CAF’s stance—raising questions about alignment between continental and global football authorities on refereeing standards and accountability.

With Ndala out, Africa’s central refereeing representation at the 2026 World Cup will now include:

• Mustapha Ghorbal (Algeria)
• Amin Mohamed Omar (Egypt)
• Pierre Ghislain Atcho (Gabon)
• Dahane Beida (Mauritania)

The list reflects FIFA’s emphasis on consistency and recent performance, particularly in high-stakes matches.

For Ndala, a FIFA-listed referee since 2013, the decision represents a significant personal and professional setback. Once seen as a strong candidate to officiate at the World Cup, his exclusion underscores how a single high-profile match can reshape a referee’s trajectory.

More broadly, the development highlights the growing scrutiny of officiating in African football and the increasing willingness of FIFA to take independent decisions—even when they diverge from continental bodies.

In the end, while players receive red cards on the pitch, Ndala’s has come off it—issued not in a moment, but in the lingering shadow of a final that refuses to fade from memory.

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

According to a report by international news agency, Reuters, Gianluigi Donnarumma, Italy’s goalkeeper, has pushed back strongly against claims that Italy’s national team players demanded financial bonuses for World Cup qualification, in a development that highlights a growing conversation around player incentives, long associated with African football—now surfacing in Europe.

The controversy followed Italy’s dramatic failure to qualify for the next FIFA World Cup after a 4-1 penalty shootout loss to Bosnia and Herzegovina in last month’s playoff final—a result that condemned the four-time champions to a third consecutive absence from football’s biggest stage.

In the aftermath, reports emerged suggesting that players had sought financial rewards tied to qualification. But Donnarumma, speaking to Sky Sports Italia, dismissed the claims in emphatic terms.

“As captain, I never went to ask the Italian national team for a single euro,” he said, insisting that any financial gestures were standard federation practice rather than player-driven demands.

According to him, what exists is a long-standing system where federations reward players after achieving qualification, not before. “Our reward was getting to go to the World Cup,” he added, underlining a distinction between earned bonuses and negotiated incentives.

A Familiar African Narrative Finds European Echo

Sports Village Square recalls that the debate, however, resonates strongly within African football circles, where bonus rows have frequently disrupted national team preparations and even tournament performances.

From delayed payments to player strikes and government interventions, financial disputes have often formed a recurring subplot in African competitions such as the Africa Cup of Nations and FIFA World Cup qualifiers.

What makes the Italian situation noteworthy is not just the denial. Still, the mere existence of such speculation suggests that the culture of bonus expectations is no longer confined to Africa, but may be creeping into the European game.

Fallout Deepens in Italian Football

Italy’s failure has already triggered sweeping changes within its football hierarchy. Gabriele Gravina stepped down as president of the Italian Football Federation amid mounting political pressure.

Former legendary goalkeeper Gianluigi Buffon also resigned as delegation chief, while head coach Gennaro Gattuso left his position.

For Donnarumma, however, the focus must now shift away from controversy and toward rebuilding.

“We have to start afresh, move on,” the 27-year-old said. “There are major competitions ahead, like the European Championship and the Nations League. Before thinking about the World Cup, we need to focus on these.”

Beyond Bonuses: A Question of Values

While Italy grapples with sporting failure and administrative upheaval, the bonus debate raises deeper questions about motivation, professionalism, and the evolving economics of international football.

In Africa, bonus disputes have often been framed as issues of fairness and welfare. In Europe, where financial structures are more stable, such narratives were once rare.

But as the Donnarumma episode suggests, the lines may be blurring—turning what was once seen as an “African problem” into a broader, global conversation about how national pride, performance, and pay intersect in modern football.

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H