Connect with us

Uncategorized

ASTON VILLA BOSS CRIES FOUL OVER MAN UNITED PENALTY AWARD

blank

Published

on

Dean Smith hit out at the ‘disgraceful decision’ that led to Manchester United going ahead from the penalty spot at Villa Park on Thursday night.

Smith was furious that VAR upheld referee Jon Moss’s decision to penalise Ezri Konsa when he collided with Bruno Fernandes, allowing the Portuguese star to put United on course for the win.

blank
Referee Jon Moss thought it was a foul and VAR backed his decision, much to Aston Villa boss’ fury

‘It all changed round on the penalty,’ said Smith. ‘I can understand Jon getting it wrong on the pitch but VAR? I don’t know what they’re looking at. It’s a disgraceful decision.

‘They’ve got a screen there they can go and look at, but they don’t seem to be bothered now. Anybody who’s been in football knows he (Bruno) is trying the drag back. His foot is on his (Konsa’s) shin.

RELATED STORIES: https://www.sportsvillagesquare.com/2020/06/20/ole-gunnar-solskjaer-delighted-by-paul-pogbas-impact-as-penalty-drama-denies-man-united/

‘I thought it would be overturned straightaway and fully expected them to give us a free-kick. I went down to the dugout and saw it on camera.

‘How somebody in the studio who had the view I saw only once made that decision is beyond me.

Advertisement

‘Five minutes after the game the 100 or so text messages I had saying it was a disgraceful decision tell me my feelings were right.’

Villa have four games to save themselves from relegation, starting at home to Crystal Palace on Sunday.

‘The belief is there but we’re running out of games,’ added Smith. ‘Every Villa fan in their hearts didn’t expect too much from Liverpool and United.’

However, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer agreed with the penalty award as United became the first club in Premier League history to win four games in a row by three goals or more.

‘Bruno has done a Zidane turn, the boy stuck his leg out and Bruno has landed on him,’ said Solskjaer. ‘If I try to jump away from someone and I land on them as they try to tackle me, it’s a penalty.

Advertisement

‘We could have scored three, four, five more. You’re happy with the way we create chances but we need to be more clinical.’

Daily Mail

Kunle Solaja is the author of landmark books on sports and journalism as well as being a multiple award-winning journalist and editor of long standing. He is easily Nigeria’s foremost soccer diarist and Africa's most capped FIFA World Cup journalist, having attended all FIFA World Cup finals from Italia ’90 to Qatar 2022. He was honoured at the Qatar 2022 World Cup by FIFA and AIPS.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Uncategorized

Sundowns get the better of Ulsan in battle of the outsiders

blank

Published

on

blank
Mamelodi Sundowns FC forward Lebo Mothiba (35) passes the ball during the second half against Ulsan HD during a group stage match of the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup at Inter&Co Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Nathan Ray Seebeck-Imagn Images

Mamelodi Sundowns and Ulsan HD had targeted their Group F opener as their best chance to get a win on the board at the Club World Cup, with Brazil’s Fluminense and German side Borussia Dortmund expected to advance from Group F.

South Africa’s Sundowns took all three points with a 1-0 win over the South Koreans and went top of the group after Fluminense drew 0-0 with Dortmund.

WHY IT’S IMPORTANT

African and Asian teams are not expected to make much of an impact at the new-look 32-team Club World Cup so points are like gold dust for the likes of the Sundowns and Ulsan.

KEY QUOTES

Advertisement

Miguel Cardoso, Mamelodi Sundowns coach: “We prepared tactically and strategically very well, and then we found a commitment between everybody. I think it was clear we made a very wonderful first half. It was important that we could keep the pace and not stray from the game plan in the second half, so that we could score a second goal that for little details or little centimetres, we could not do.”

Kim Pan-gon, Ulsan HD head coach: “We had targeted this game to win because we understand the other two teams in the group, Fluminense and Borussia Dortmund, are favourites. Our players gave their best efforts in this game and we’re very proud of their efforts. Now we need to recover quickly for the next game.”

-Reuters

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mexico readies for historic third World Cup as Azteca Stadium tensions grow

blank

Published

on

blank

With a year until Mexico makes history as the first three-time World Cup host, the dream of a spectacular showcase is colliding with the practical challenges of modernising the iconic Azteca Stadium for global soccer’s premier event.

Beneath the imposing silhouette of Mexico’s football cathedral – where Pele dazzled with Brazil in 1970 and Maradona’s ‘hand of God’ propelled Argentina to glory in 1986 – construction crews tackle the formidable task of bringing one of the sport’s most storied venues into the 21st century.

The stakes are magnified as the ‘Santa Ursula colossus’ will host the tournament’s opening match, a global spectacle that will focus the world’s attention on Mexico from day one.

Renovations will expand the stadium’s capacity from 87,000 to 90,000, with upgrades centred on meeting FIFA standards through new changing rooms, enhanced hospitality zones, revamped VIP areas and additional seating in spaces previously occupied by boxes and lounges.

While government officials and football administrators envisioned the project as a symbol of national pride, the renovation process has eroded trust between developers, local residents and other stakeholders.

Advertisement

Stadium administrators announced in February that they had secured a 2.1 billion peso ($110.19 million) credit line from local financial group Banorte – along with a controversial new name: Estadio Banorte.

FIFA regulations mean the stadium will be referred to as “Estadio Ciudad de Mexico” during the World Cup, yet the rebranding has sparked a fierce backlash from some fans, who view it as sacrificing football heritage for commercial interests.

HARSH REALITY

The backlash over the stadium’s new name represents only one facet of the mounting tensions. Box and suite holders – some with relationships spanning decades – have threatened legal action after FIFA announced it would commandeer their seats during the tournament, overriding established contracts.

One member of the Mexican Association of Box Holders has already filed a legal challenge to defend access rights.

Advertisement

Beyond the stadium walls, frustration runs equally deep. Residents of Santa Ursula and surrounding neighbourhoods fear that promised infrastructure improvements like pedestrian bridges and transit lines will fail to address fundamental issues including inadequate lighting, water shortages and persistent traffic congestion.

“We’re not the stadium’s backyard,” one local resident told Expansion Politica. “But we’re always treated that way.”

By contrast, Guadalajara and Monterrey, Mexico’s other two host cities, face fewer obstacles.

Guadalajara’s 48,000-seat stadium, opened in 2010, has already hosted major events including the 2011 Pan American Games, while Monterrey’s 53,500-capacity venue, inaugurated in 2015, needs only minor upgrades – primarily new turf and a pitch ventilation system.

“We’ll install a system to ventilate and oxygenate the pitch before replacing the grass,” said Alejandro Hutt, Monterrey’s Host City Manager. “That will be an important legacy from the World Cup and beyond.”

Advertisement

As construction continues, Javier Aguirre’s Mexico squad are building towards a crucial summer, with a Gold Cup title defence ahead and friendly matches against Turkey this week, followed by Japan and South Korea in September.

After failing to advance beyond the group stage at Qatar 2022 – their worst World Cup performance since 1978 – Mexican fans crave more than just a well organised tournament. They want to see Mexico break the ‘fifth-game‘ curse and reach the quarter-finals for the first time since 1986, the last time they were World Cup hosts.

-Reuters

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Queens and Angels depart from the President Federation Cup

blank

Published

on

blank

All contenders are now known for this year’s President Federation Cup grand finale, following Saturday’s elimination of Edo Queens and Ibom Angels in the women’s semi-finals.

Multiple-winners Rivers Angels saw off the stiff challenge of Ibom Angels of Uyo 1-0 in Aba, while Nasarawa Amazons bumped Edo Queens 2-0 in Ayingba.

Cup holders Rivers Angels, who have won the competition nine times, will have their hands full against 2005 and 2019 champions Nasarawa Amazons of Lafia.

In the men’s competition, Abakaliki FC of Ebonyi are getting set to tackle Kwara United FC in the final.

Results of Semi Finals (Women)

Advertisement
  • Rivers Angels (Rivers) 1-0 Ibom Angels (Akwa Ibom)
  • Edo Queens (Edo) 0-2 Nasarawa Amazons (Nasarawa)

Results of Semi-Finals (Men)

  • Abakaliki FC (Ebonyi) 0-0 Ikorodu City (Lagos) – Abakaliki FC win 5-4 on penalties
  • Kwara United (Kwara) 1-0 Rangers Int’l (Enugu)

WOMEN’S FINAL

  • Rivers Angels vs Nasarawa Amazons

MEN’S FINAL

  • Abakaliki FC VS Kwara United   

 Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Continue Reading

Most Viewed