Argentina will begin a trial this week into the medical team of late soccer icon Diego Maradona over homicide by negligence, a case that has charged up emotions in the country where the World Cup winner still commands almost God-like reverence.

The trial, expected to last for months, starts on Tuesday, over four years after Maradona’s death in November 2020 from heart failure at age 60 after undergoing brain surgery days earlier. His medical team generally rejects the charges.

A court in San Isidro, on the outskirts of Buenos Aires, will listen to nearly 120 testimonies. The defendants are charged with “simple homicide with eventual intent” in the treatment of the former Boca Juniors and Napoli player.

Maradona’s death rocked the South American nation where he was revered, prompting a period of mourning and angry finger pointing about who was to blame after the icon’s years-long battle with addiction and ill health.

Nicknamed “D10S”, a play on the Spanish word for god, and “Pelusa” for his prominent hair, Maradona battled alcohol and drug addiction, but was adored – including in tattoos, opens new tab – for his flawed genius that led Argentina to World Cup glory in 1986.

That sharpened anger around his death, while a medical board appointed to investigate the circumstances concluded in early 2021 that the soccer star’s medical team had acted in an “inappropriate, deficient and reckless manner”.

“I hope there’s justice because they killed him. Diego (Maradona) should be alive,” Argentina merchant Luis Alberto Suarez told Reuters in Buenos Aires. “They didn’t take care of him.”

A medical board appointed to investigate Maradona’s death found in early 2021 that the soccer star’s medical team acted in an “inappropriate, deficient and reckless manner”.

Not everyone was so sure, however.

“I can only speak from what I see from the outside. But we can’t say if they were wrong or not,” said self-employed worker Martin Milei.

“In hindsight, they got it completely wrong. But I think there are more people responsible than what’s being said.”

Unemployed Argentine Pablo Knopfler said he hoped that the trial would uncover the truth.

“I hope there’s a trial to know with more clarity what happened to Diego,” he said. “Perhaps there’s someone up above us or maybe Diego himself who wants to shed light on what happened to him so that the truth is revealed.”

Reuters

Follow the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

Players’ union FIFPRO called for a review of governance in Gabonese soccer after welcoming on Wednesday a life ban handed by world body FIFA to a former youth coach found guilty of the sexual abuse of players.

The banned former under-17 coach, Patrick Assoumou Eyi, was also fined 1 million Swiss francs ($1.13 million).

FIFA’s independent ethics committee found Eyi guilty of “abusing his position and committing repeated acts of sexual abuse against multiple players” between 2006 and 2021.

FIFPRO said the ban was the result of “over three years of sustained pressure from civil society, FIFPRO and the media to ensure accountability” but there was more to be done.

“This case illustrates the systemic nature of this grave problem, where an individual may be sanctioned, but the same governance system that allowed it to occur in the first place remains,” it said.

Remy Ebanega, president of the Gabonese player union, said in the statement that the abuse had been widely known about within Gabonese football but “many of those in power chose to turn a blind eye”.

“Ignoring abuse is a clear breach of FIFA regulations, and we now expect a full review of the Gabonese FA’s suitability to govern football in Gabon,” he said.

Reuters has sought a comment from the Gabonese soccer body Fegafoot. There was no mention of FIFA’s action on their Facebook page or website.

-Reuters

Follow the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H

With the football law-making body, the International Football Association Board (IFAB), getting ready to implement major changes next season, an explanation has been offered on how the eight-second rule for the goalkeeper will be affected.

The essence of penalising the goalkeeper is to make the game faster and fairer.

If a keeper holds the ball for more than eight seconds, the other team will get a corner kick instead of an indirect free kick.

This will be implemented by the referee counting down the seconds with their hands.

Also, the offside rule is still being reviewed, but VAR decisions will now be made public, meaning that fans and players will be able to see and hear the reasoning behind the referee’s decision.

A new rule will also stop players from crowding over the referees.

Only the team captain will be allowed to approach them in certain situations, in the hopes of improving communication and reducing arguments between players and officials.

The neutral drop ball rule is changing, too.If the play is stopped when the ball is outside the penalty area, the ball will be dropped for the team that had or would have had possession. If it’s not clear, it goes to the team that last touched it.

FIFA has also made a rule about when players off the pitch touch the ball. If a team official or player who’s not on the field touches the ball, the other team gets an indirect free kick.

There will be no red cards unless there was intent to interfere.

FIFA is also testing body cameras for referees. After good feedback from trials in some high-level matches, they’ll be used in the upcoming Club World Cup.

The cameras will help with training and could improve refereeing standards.

On “Wenger’s law,” IFAB also decided to look for competitions to conduct additional offside trials that encourage attacking football. Therefore, the law is still under study.

 Follow the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H